[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LDP License (full text)

To: ldp-discuss@lists.linuxdoc.org
Subject: Re: LDP License (full text)
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Date: 08 Oct 1999 15:31:41 -0400
In-reply-to: bf347@lafn.org's message of "Thu, 30 Sep 1999 23:00:03 -0700"
References: <199910010600.AA01196@lafn.org>
Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Resent-date: 8 Oct 1999 19:31:27 -0000
Resent-from: ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org
Resent-message-id: <je45TD.A._x.Pak_3@murphy>
Resent-sender: ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
Sender: apharris@burrito.onshore.com
User-agent: Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) Emacs/20.3


Regarding the LDP license, speaking informally as a Debian person, it
looks quite good to me (i.e., DFSG free)

Do you mind if I kick it over to <debian-legal@lists.debian.org> for
comment?

FYI, I know that licensing issues are exhausting, but I'm glad to see
you guys are toughing it out and getting it done.  

-- 
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

References:
- LDP License (full text)
  - From: bf347@lafn.org (David Lawyer)

Prev by Date: Re: Removal of HOWTOs
Next by Date: Re: Draft Bolierplate License
Previous by thread: A restrictive(?) LDP License
Next by thread: Re: LDP License (full text)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread